|
|
|
|
|
Yu-Gi-Oh! episode Evil Spirit of the Ring
| | |
One of my favorite episodes. Bakura, the foreign exchanged student, has come to Duelist Kingdom with Yugi and his friends. In reality, Bakura holds the Millennium Ring, which allows the evil spirit (Yami) of a thief to take over Bakura's body against his will. In this episode, Yami Bakura challeng ...more |
| |
|
|
|
From: anonononymous*
, 240 months, post #21 |
bush i wonder if he has a bush? i predict somthing big will happen
very soon. bring back clinton he was da man! so all you haters out
der eat bush and shut up
|
|
From: anonononymous*
, 240 months, post #22 |
bush i wonder if he has a bush? i predict somthing big will happen
very soon. bring back clinton he was da man! so all you haters out
der eat bush and shut up
|
|
From: Reynold James Dalton*
, 240 months, post #23 |
yeah i think so too
|
|
From: Neverhappy*
, 240 months, post #24 |
Hay look another uneducated comment by Ricktumor, big surprise
there. Okay Clinton was good president but did do a few things
unethical and illegal. You talk about Bush being a lier, Ricktumor
Clinton lied very chance He got. You say that Bush is in business
with the Saudies will Num Nut who in international business isn't.
Have wait a minute didn't Clinton get a large sum of campaign money
for Chinese business men in return for favor for China. Not to
mention that if Clinton did come back it would be cool because in
is unconstitutional. If you read the contitution, you know that
little 200 year piece of paper that is the blue print for this
country, you know this stuff. That half of the stupid crap that
rolls form your mouth will never come to pass. Saddy you don't know
this, it is to be expected form a person that graduated Magna-Cum
Num Nut. Ricktumor: So every president is a lying, forked tongued
snake that talks out of both sides of their mouths. Plus they would
sale this country to the highest bidder if give the chance.
Neverhappy: Why yes little Ricktumor, you see politicians are not
to be trusted that is why we need to go to school and learn how to
stop them. It is important to realize that politicians work for us
and not the other way around. Ricktumor: Wow I am such a Num-Nuted
Assclown. NeverHappy: You sure are Ricktumor, you sure are.
--Neverhappy AKA the smartest man in the three Universes
p.s. Yes there are three universes!
|
|
From: anonononymous*
, 240 months, post #25 |
yer but when clinton did it people did'nt die you small brained
chimp, who sucks on the balls of life, so your comments are false,
you big poo brain smelly mouth!!! he he he
CLINTON 4EVER (any clinton)
ps i think you call yourself Neverhappy because your penis is so
small and tiny like a chimps
|
|
From: hskfmn*
, 240 months, post #26 |
Is this really getting us anywhere? Ricktumor, get a fucking life!
Neverhappy, if you're going to critisize, use founded evidence.
Don't exagerate.
I don't object to people arguing, but commenting on the size of
ones genitalia and calling names is pointless.
Just something to think about.
|
|
From: Reynold James Dalton*
, 240 months, post #27 |
who is Ricktumor?
|
|
From: Reynold James Dalton*
, 240 months, post #28 |
Neverhappy: DEAR GOD, MAN, DON'T YOU KNOW PROPER ENGLISH? Just
reading your posts makes me want to explode. Although, thinking
about the content of your post, you're actually making some
semi-valid points.
Clarification: Clinton invaded a surprising number of countries in
small military missions. It was never made into a big deal on the
TV, however, because Clinton won his election by defaming Bush Sr.
for doing the very same thing.
Clarification: Clinton was a horrible president. He had little to
nothing to do with most of what went on during his presidency that
people gave him credit for.
To hskfmn:
First of all, Bush did not invade Iraq on a whim. That was a
tactical strike that had been in the planning ever since Bush Sr.
was in office. It's just been waiting for a president who would put
it into motion. Had Clinton actually been a good president, it
would have been he who invaded.
Iraq indeed needs help that Bush is not giving, but Kerry will not
give it. Kerry's whole platform (if you can call it that) on the
issue is that he is entirely against the war and he'll get us out
of there as fast as he possibly can (By the way, this contradicts
most of what he said when the war first started). He may or may not
pull them out imediately, but he will not increase it to the level
it needs to be and will most likely weaken our position in the
Middle East more than help. Bush, at the moment, can't do what
needs to be done because he has to win the election. If Bush wins
the election, he will be free of that because he can't run for
president again and therefor will be able to do what needs to be
done. Kerry can't do this because he will be outright going against
his platform, thus screwing his chances for winning a second
election (damn political parties to hell). Therefor, Bush is the
only one capable of doing what needs to be done at the moment and,
while he may not go as far as he needs to, he will do more than
Kerry, upon which the next president can build upon. If we wait for
Kerry's second term, it will most likely be too late.
Someone commented that something big is comming. Would you like to
know what it is? WWIII. Look at history, look at psychology and
then look at the present situation. We are on the onset of another
world war; sometime between the next 50-100 years, it will begin.
Our chance to stop it is already passed, but we can still change
the outcome of it. If we do not break the back of the Islamic
radicals, they will get their hands on nuclear weapons or other
WMD. You think the reaction was bad when terrorists killed a few
thousand people, think about how bad it will be when they level
entire cities, killing millions of people in an instant. Our
reaction will be, of course, retaliation with nuclear force. End of
life as we know it. That's worst case scenario, but here's another.
We keep up in Iraq as we are now, but we stop the countries
currently attempting to become nuclear powers (their securities are
weak, this is where the radicals will get their nukes). When the
war starts, it will last a long period of years, far longer than
has ever before been seen in history. In the end, one side of the
war will be devistated and recieve the entire blame because of the
corruption within the UN. That side will slowly (but not slowly
enough) become a dictatorship that will rise up again, leading to
yet another world war, after which the cycle starts over with
another time of peace before the next set of world wars. And do not
tell me that we're better than that, because we're not. History
will repeat itself as long as humanity remains unchanged.
Of course, there is a best case scenario, wherein we break the
cycle of war, peace and revolution. It is possible now because of
the new levels of communication we have acheived, but it all
depends on whether or not two certain things happen first. First
off, we need to open communication to the highest level we are
able. If we do, the marketplace of ideas will spread, breaking down
political bounderies and national borders. Second, we must break
the Islamic radicals. If we have these terrorists involved, their
sickening blind devotion to their corrupt cause will drag the war
on for too long and the communication will break down before it can
be effective.
If we do these things, the length and brutality of the war will be
significantly diminished and will be just as much a war of words as
a war or weapons. When it ends, humanity will have finally become
better than it was, will have reached a new level of understanding.
The United Nations and all of its corruption will be disolved and a
new, actually effective organization will take its place. Conflict
will not cease to exist, but it will never again reach the
horrifying levels it has in the past.
Of course, that is a longshot. The biggest thing preventing us from
opening communication as much as we need to is our politics. If you
look at colleges and government funded research programs, they have
to produce results that actually have applications in the real
world or they loose their funding. Because of this, their
experiments are most often biased in favor of what the government
wants and must also be kept mostly secret. What we need is to allow
scientists to study just to learn more, to understand how the
universe really works. There are more than enough scientists who
would love to be able to do this.
So, Think! Challange what has always been accepted! Strive to
understand! The future depends on it.
Oh, and one more thing. Neverhappy is right. All presidents lie.
It's just how and why they do it that matters. Some presidents lie
to protect the American people (this does not always have bad
results). Others lie to inrease their control over the country. In
Bush's case, he intentionally missled us (at least those of us who
bought it) to get support for the Iraq campaign. While I personally
feel the reasoning is wrong, it may truely have been the only way
to get this thing going. In Kerry's case (the man lies through his
teeth), he's lying because he wants the democrats to win the
presidency. While neither is truely a nobel cause, Kerry's is the
lesser of two evils.
On a closing note, whoever's parading themselves around as me had
better stop. If you keep it up, I track you down, shatter your
kneecaps, nail your hands to the ground and brand runes of the void
on your body.
Have a nice day.
|
|
From: hskfmn*
, 240 months, post #29 |
Reynold, that was truly insightful. Thank you. I know you're right
about many of the issues that you have touched upon. I still want
Kerry to win this election. That's just who I am; a Democrat
through-and-through. You are right about history repeating itself.
There is no doubt whatsoever about that. I do wonder; however, if
you're correct about Kerry pulling out of Iraq immediately. I would
think (at least hope) that he knows he can't do that. I may be
mistaken. No one really knows that but him and maybe a few others.
When I said that Bush invaded Iraq on a "whim," that was not what I
should have said. But I do believe that Bush invaded Iraq, as you
said, for his father. This, to me, seems to imply a sort of grudge,
no matter how small, and I'm not sure whether or not the American
people would have allowed Clinton to do it either, but that time
has passed and no one can really say. My real point is that we
should not be "invading" anybody. We should be making treaties or
agreements that insures an American presence in the Middle-East but
not a violent one like we currently have.
Lastly, I know that all presidents lie. That is a fact. It's just
that when Bush lied, he did it to get support to invade a country
that, in my mind, we had no business being in. That's just my
opinion and that's why it angers me so much.
Those are my thoughts. Thanks for reading.
P.S. - I like your last comment/threat. I think it's funny.
|
|
From: Neverhappy*
, 240 months, post #30 |
Reynold James Dalton, you are a very smart person to read.
Ricktumor, on the other hand is a Ass-Clown from the plant Moron in
the Retarted galaxy. The other thing is that I do not know proper
English due to the fact I went to a public school in the armpit of
the world, North Texas. Plus I was born with only half of a brain
but I still seem to be smarter that the rest of the humans walking
the earth. hskfmn I do not tells lies they're just truth bent out
of context to serve my purpose. That Micheal Moore does it all the
time but do you hear people winny and complaining no, they give him
awards.
|
|
From: anti Reynold James Dalton club*
, 240 months, post #31 |
YOU ALL LICKING Reynold James DaltonS ASS "lick lick"
plus who the fuck do you think you are! coming on this web page
speading yo shit thinking yo better than us fuck off!
oh yer Neverhappy i will make it so yo neverhappy again bitch!
|
|
From: Neverhappy*
, 240 months, post #32 |
anti Reynold James Dalton club, Don't sing it just bring it
anytime, anywhere you just show up I will bring the pain.
I don't like you, I don't respect you, and I sure as hell don't
fear you.
|
|
From: Nevermadeawomanhappy*
, 240 months, post #33 |
he he he
|
|
From: Neverhappy*
, 240 months, post #34 |
Nevermadeawomanhappy, final some that is turthful with thenselves.
Remember just because you Nevermadeawomenhappy dosn't make less of
a man your just slow and scared of them.
|
|
From: Nevermadeawomanhappy*
, 240 months, post #35 |
but yo mom said she liked it! good and and hard, but i had to turn
her down i dont like fat chicks with hairy armpits and smelly
breath yuuuk, but i suppose shes your mom and you love her, i just
could'nt bring myself to do it with her sorry!
|
|
From: Neverhappy*
, 240 months, post #36 |
hey tony is that you my mom's been trying to ring you??????
she said she want to wrap her large flabby arms around you she
misses you so much
|
|
From: Neverhappy*
, 240 months, post #37 |
hey paul can you do smothing about this guy i love him so much!
|
|
From: Reynold James Dalton*
, 240 months, post #38 |
hskfmn:
There's part of your problem. Only a fool ties himself to a party
beyond all compromise (look at all the fools in Hollywood).
Here seems to be the real problem. You believe in honor in war.
That's the biggest load of garbage I've ever heard. People have
something against striking first, but to sit and wait for them to
hit you is just plain stupid. An example one of my friends used
when we discussed this, he can cripple you with one blow and he
doesn't have to hit very hard (he nearly hospitalized me by
accident once). Why would you sit and wait for him to attack if you
know that? To tie in the metaphor, even when I was still
questioning whether or not WMD were in Iraq, I still believed the
strike to be the propper thing. Saddam is completely unstable and
paranoid (wouldn't you be if almost everyone in your own country
would gladly torture and kill you slowly if they could get their
hands on you?). We should have struck the moment he became
non-compliant. There are times when striking first saves more lives
and Iraq is the best example. How many less people would have been
killed by that inhuman creature if we had taken him out when we
first knew? How many children would have been able to grow up? How
many people who didn't die would still be able to have children? We
can't make treaties with ruthless dictators because their too
paranoid. We can't make treaties with radicals because their logic
is in no way similar to ours. Striking first, before they can kill
us, is the only way sometimes. We had no business in Iraq? No
offense, but wake up, please.
Now, don't get me wrong; I'm not trying to justify war. War is
always wrong, always evil. But what you fail to realize is that
there is a different between right and correct. For the greater
good, sometimes you must set aside your emotions and preconcieved
notions of right and wrong to realize what is the correct thing to
do. It's sad, but it's a fact.
On my threat, I do that all the time. It's my way of saying I
really don't like what you're doing, but I'm not going to do
anything about it. I once threatened to lock someone in a dark room
with a bunch of gay oompa-loompas while playing Celine Dion's "My
Heart Will Go On." It made a bunch of gay people angry too. I had a
hard time appologizing because I was laughing so hard that people
would take offense to such a bizzare statement.
Neverhappy:
I glad you like reading my posts. I exist only to make people
think. But please, stop your continual insulting of other people
(or at least be a little more creative). We don't need to give
justification to their meaningless comments by responding.
Anti-me club:
Bring it on. But know this, if your arguments are not logically
thought out, based on solid facts or don't make a clear point, I
will simply ignore you.
I don't think I'm better than anyone. Quite the opposite, I happen
to know exactly what I am. All I know is people and people are
nothing. They are infentessimal specks, wandering half-conscious on
an infentessimal speck, which orbits an infentessimal speck in a
cluster of infentessimal specks. I strive to know more, though I am
completely aware that in my lifetime I will never know more than
nothing. You, on the other hand, seem to beleive you actually know
something.
And what about all the liberal propoganda that's been spreading out
on this threadline? I'm not pushing forward some political scheme,
I'm presenting the facts. If you don't want to listen to it, just
shove your head further up our ass until you can't see the computer
screen anymore (Neverhappy: don't take that as an example of being
creative).
One little clarification: I accidentally said that Kerry's lie was
the lesser of two evils; I meant Bush's (but I'm hopping you
already figured that out).
|
|
From: pylea_girl*
, 240 months, post #39 |
Hi,
Yami Bakura was a thief and a tomb robber. One day he went in and
tried to steal the millennium items and to make a long story short
his soul was sealed in the ring. The Pharaoh used up all his power
and sealed himself in the millennium puzzle.
Pegasus and Marik just happen to have items and be the season
villains nothing else. But, I do agree that Bakura and the dark
spirit are rather interesting characters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add a New Message to This Thread
Posting Guidelines
Primary
- ANY POST(s) MAY BE REMOVED at the discretion of moderators
for violation of this website's guidelines/rules or any law
applicable to this website.
- All discussions must be transformation related OR of interest to
the transformation community.
- Please try to keep posts appropriate for younger teenage eyes to
view (Things you'd be comfortable sharing with a 13 year-old).
- Do not 'attack' other posters. You may attack an individual's
comments but not the individual.
- Be polite, courteous, and respectful. Please keep the conversations
civil.
- While use of an online alias is ok. Do NOT pretend to be another
(or registered) user.
Intellectual Property
- Do not post direct links to complete copyrighted works. Links
provided by (or approved by) the copyright holder may
be exempt.
- Links to content hosted on websites that have a clear, and easy to
find, process for dealing with infringement(s); and a known
reputation for following through with said process, may
be allowed.
- Please read this site's views on copyrighted content on the FAQ
page.
- Do not plagiarize. Credit your sources.
Helpful
- For posts and material that are not safe for viewing in a workplace
or with younger eyes, please mark the thread or post as either, "MATURE CONTENT", "ADULT CONTENT",
or "NSFW".
- Please post clear SPOILER warnings if you intend to give away
details that would spoil the story for those who have not yet seen
the material, preferably by using the spoiler
tags (don't forget to close the spoiler text with the end tag),
like so: <spoiler>Text to be "hidden"
</spoiler>
-- For additional help, please see: HOW TO: Use Spoiler tags
message thread.
- When starting a New Message Thread, please include details about
your topic of discussion or request in the Subject
field to help draw in readers who are interested and avoid wasting
the time of those who are not. Also helpful in searching for the
topic/thread later.
- If you post a link, please provide some detail as to what it is.
Identify the material if possible.
- Please post in English, or include an English translation, when
possible.
- If seeking material / information, include the results of your own
efforts so that others can offer better help (and avoid wasting
time and effort on redundant searches).
- When starting a new thread to request material or information,
please begin the subject with "REQ:"
or "REQUEST".
Etiquette
- Do not post messages in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
- Do not attack a user for improper spelling and/or grammar. Not all
of our community uses English as their native language.
- Please do not stray (far) from the topic of the original post.
- If a poster provides their contact information for any reason, do
NOT clutter the Message Board by asking them to contact you. They
gave out their contact information for a reason.
- No begging. Ask nicely.
- Do not feed the trolls and spammers. Please ignore them.
- Do not keep asking for clips after others have already posted
information on where to obtain the material.
- Please have some patience. Not everyone visits the board daily.
Your post may not be seen (by someone with the correct information
or idea) for several days or weeks.
- No bumping. Bumping will be treated as intentional spamming.
Advertising
- Do not post advertisements.
- One exception is for products or services that relate to entries on
this site. And even then, only post an announcement once. You
should add links or content to the appropriate database entries. Do
not repeat this information to the message board. Doing so will be
considered spamming.
Miscellaneous
- This list is neither all-inclusive or all-exclusive in nature, and
is meant to guide everyone on appropriate content for and conduct
on this Message Board.
- The purpose of this Message Board is to share information about
transformation-related content, news, ideas, etc. Also acceptable,
are conversations that are of interest to the transformation
community.
- Moderation of posts for reasons not listed above are at the
discretion of the Trusted Users who moderate this website, for the
purpose of keeping things within the "spirit" of the owner's wishes
and the website's purpose.
- If you disagree with a moderation decision, please make an argument
as to why it should be reinstated. Use the posting guidelines to justify your point.
Do not attack the moderator.
[Edit this Page] | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|