|
From: Air Gear
, 78 months, post #61 |
Apropos, especially
given who he's going to be turning into come Christmas Day 2017.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS-rwxQsJ0Q
|
|
From: guest
, 78 months, post #62 |
Just taking this back to the OP, I'm a little surprised to see
anyone at fictionmania be an SJW considering most of the stories on
that site involve some of the most sexist, mysoginistic, and often
racist writing imaginable. I would expect SJWs, feminists, and many
trans people would want to burn that site to the ground.
|
|
From: guest (Fed Up)
, 78 months, post #63 |
We have already seen their demands on authors to change wording or
story structure.
|
|
From: guest (Fed Up)
, 78 months, post #64 |
“your apparent NEED to point that out to someone who had used the
word "cis" to specific that the person was biologically that way”
...............
Again, why is there any NEED to label as “cis” someone who already
is, when “trans” works to specify someone who is not?
|
|
From: Air Gear
, 78 months, post #65 |
SHUT UP EVERYONE HE SAID
|
|
From: guest (Fed Up)
, 78 months, post #66 |
Do not like the conversation? You are welcome to take the same path
out that brought you in.
|
|
From: guest
, 78 months, post #67 |
fedup, that's the transmafia
they wanna impose their agenda, but when confronted with people who
can argue with reason, they go like a pidgeon chess player... they
poop their last argument and flies away with their pride and
magnificence
|
|
From: guest (4614)
, 78 months, post #68 |
LOL... so when someone becomes fed up with someone like "FedUp" and
just doesn't think it's worth arguing about anymore... even THAT is
used against them. Amazing.
|
|
From: guest (Bud)
, 78 months, post #69 |
I think it's funny how the "party of science" demands that I pledge
my life and every waking hour to fighting climate change yet they
are the ones that believe there are 76 genders. The ones that
demand I stop driving my car or buy an expensive electric car are
the ones that fly on 747s every day and live in million dollar
mansions. Hard to take you serious when you don't practice what you
preach.
|
|
From: guest (123456)
, 78 months, post #70 |
cis is a hate word...always used in a condescending way...if gay's
and transgendered don't want to be called faggots or tranny's then
don't make up derogatory for NORMAL people
ps Libtards/dems suck dog dicks
|
|
From: guest (123489)
, 78 months, post #71 |
also SJW's are bigoted freaks
|
|
From: guest (Susan)
, 78 months, post #72 |
> cis is a hate word...always used in a condescending way
Okay, I was being quiet but WHAT?!?!
I have almost never heard "cis" be used in a derogatory way. We
must be on different internets. I'm guessing you go to places where
they want to exclude cis-people and that's why you see it that way.
The only time I or my friends ever use it in a way that could even
remotely be taken that way is if we're saying that someone who
never had a problem just can't understand what it's like for
someone who has. But I am another person who sees it as a clinical
word to differentiate between women who never had to deal with any
kind of disphoria and those who did. I definitely don't see it as
condescending. In fact, I am jealous of cis-people.
|
|
From: guest (Bud)
, 78 months, post #73 |
Cis is definitely derogatory and negative. It basically means that
if you're born a man or a woman and like being the gender you were
born with then your opinion is less than that of a transgender
person when it comes to gender issues.
I'll never understand how a country caters to a group of people
that is less than 1 percent of the population. I guess it's 2017 so
anything goes.
|
|
From: Air Gear
, 78 months, post #74 |
The country's always catered to a group of people that is less than
1 percent of the population.
They're called the "extremely rich".
|
|
From: guest (Bud)
, 78 months, post #75 |
The CDC backs me up on the stats. Transgender people make up less
than 1 percent of the population. Gays make up 3 percent of the
population. This isn't from FOX News or whatever conservative based
source you may think I got the stats from.
|
|
From: Air Gear
, 78 months, post #76 |
Not exactly the point I was making there Bud, nor was I disputing
your figures. I was making a different point.
In terms of being catered for, that I would dispute in that those
groups seem to proportionally higher to extremely higher victims of
crime, hate crimes, and even murder; also from police, government
and CDC statistics among others, I'm sure.
|
|
From: guest (Fed Up)
, 78 months, post #77 |
"But I am another person who sees it as a clinical word to
differentiate between women who never had to deal with any kind of
disphoria and those who did."
............................
And again, does not the term woman and trans-woman do that?
Yes it does.
So can it not just be left like that?
No!
Because the SJW bully crowd cannot have that, a label must be put
on those who are not trans, a label that can later, if desired, be
used as a tool to attack them. "Cis" people are___________.
It would be tough to find a more hateful group, everyone must fit
into our box, our way of thinking, or else, than progressive SJW's.
|
|
From: guest (bullshiter)
, 78 months, post #78 |
someone who never had a problem just can't understand what it's
like for someone who has
SJW at it's finest
|
|
From: guest (Fed Up)
, 78 months, post #79 |
SJW,s projecting their problems on to everyone else. It is a
trademark of theirs.
|
|
From: guest (Valkan)
, 78 months, post #80 |
(sarcasm)
And again, does not the term sexual and homosexual do that?
Yes it does.
So can it not just be left like that? Why do we need a clinical
word like heterosexual when homosexual is enough?
I know language like that alienates the minority, but I think my
preference overrides their inclusion and you're part of a big mean
mafia for telling me otherwise.
Someone might be mean and call me a heterosexual with a
condescending tone because I'm not as knowledgeable of gay issues
as them. I can't risk that.
(/sarcasm)
|