|
From: cj
, 225 months, post #1 |
Is the gas an entity or just a gas? Is this actually a possession,
or is it simply the same young woman under the influence of some
type of gaseous drug or the like?
And did you mean "absorbs their Aura"?
I must need some sleep.
|
|
From: guest (Freya)
, 225 months, post #2 |
The gas is an alien entity which has basically come to Earth
because it feeds on orgasmic energy and it finds humans orgasmic
energy to be the best in the Universe.
It possesses the girl but there are times where her mind is in
control. When the eneity in the girl has sex and the man orgasms
inside her they turn to a golden dust which is absorbed into her,
the only remains left not absorbed is a brown dust pile.
|
|
From: Bieeanda
, 225 months, post #3 |
Just watched the episode, it is a possession.Click to show spoiler
Gur tnf vf frys-zbgvir naq pbzzhavpngrf frireny gvzrf. Vg srrqf bss
gur raretl eryrnfrq ol gur znyr pyvznk, xvyyvat gur zna va gur
cebprff.
And beyond the fact that it's a post-watershed show, which also
helps to explain the foul language and rather explicit violence at
times, it's a conceit of the extended Doctor Who universe that
bisexuality is the norm among humans (notwithstanding cultural
inculcation toward heterosexuality, of course).
That's no excuse for the gay daleks, though.
|
|
From: guest (InkPott)
, 225 months, post #4 |
Whoah ! . . .
|
|
From: guest (anonymous me)
, 225 months, post #5 |
TMI !
|
|
From: guest (foo)
, 225 months, post #6 |
Note the episode title is "Day One"
|
|
From: guest (uri)
, 225 months, post #7 |
Certainly Captain Jack, the lead character, is enthusiastically
bisexual (pansexual?), and it was explained, in the Empty Child
episode of Doctor Who, that this is the norm for humans in the 51st
century, whence Captain Jack originates. However, Russell T. Davies
proclivities notwithstanding, I don't think that bisexuality is
presented as the "norm" in the broader Dr. Who universe.
|
|
From: guest
, 225 months, post #8 |
Any hole's a goal, eh? :)
|
|
From: Bieeanda
, 225 months, post #9 |
I should have made my comment clearer, sorry. By 'extended
universe' I was referring to the 'New Adventures of Doctor Who'
novels, in particular the stories that take place after the 21st
century. Rather often, the authors would go out of their way to
mention a culture of bi- or pansexuality, which suggests that they
were either trying to be edgy or someone had put far too much
thought into the series bible.
Then I realized that working back from that could spark an argument
over the formation of human sexuality, which would be both
pointless and silly.
So, with that out of the way, it's abundantly clear that the gay
daleks put something in Cardiff's water supply.
|
|
From: cj
, 225 months, post #10 |
>>> "Note the episode title is "Day One""
Thank you. Corrected.
|
|
From: guest (a mobster named jerk)
, 220 months, post #11 |
basically anything sparks anything in the message boards an ebony
flow sort of i guess
|
|
From: guest (a mobster named jerk)
, 220 months, post #12 |
okay another thing is and this is something i have an opinion on
don't disrespect others for their own sexuality because it's wrong
to do such i mean if you think about it we certainly can't judge
someone so harshly because of their own sexuality it is like saying
take the life out of the person or just destroying their lives
right there and then you can't and everyone has their opinions on
this but i believe it is their rightful choice to express
themselves in anyway they want sexual or not i have made my point
good day
|
|
From: guest (TGFan)
, 219 months, post #13 |
The new Doctor Who series has been "fantastic". Unfortunately
"Torchwood" has been most disappointing and appears to be under the
impression that just making characters gay and using plenty of
swearing is an instant way to success. Not that there's anything
wrong either of those things in the right context, but neither is a
substitute for actual quality scriptwriting.
|