Metamorphose.org
A Catalog of Transformations, Plus Reviews and Alerts
Request an Account
age
animal
female
furry
gender
inanimate
male
mythical
size
were
MSG Board
505   http://list.tsfcomic
7   iSwap (2024)
1   Any audio books with
2   Please help identify
1   Looking for body swa
9   Any books with ftf s
48   Voice Fake celebs
Sam (2015)
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
From: cj , 108 months, post #241
"... on the subject of legal issues, does anyone think this film itself might possibly face one?"

Okay, now I feel like I missed something important. What are you referring to regarding possible legal issues?


"Was snippy sarcasm really needed here?"

If I was being sarcastic, I would have noted it. How can they know what the movie is about, and that links weren't already provided, unless they've been (at least somewhat) following the threads (here and/or elsewhere)? It was a legitimate question, although meant to be more rhetorical, than needing to be answered.

Yeah, I might have been a bit snippy. I'm getting old and cynical... tired of watching the decline in respectable personal attributes of patience, respect, honesty, and effort (work). Seems everyone increasingly wants something for nothing, and to have it catered to them right now. Sometimes I feel like we're heading down the path to our own destruction. But, I have hope. Perhaps a (metaphorical) smack in the face, from time to time, is just what the world / people need to rise above the "it's all about me" attitude. I'm not saying that our guest poster IS one of those people who tend to irk me... but they sure did a good facsimile IMO. /rant

From: guest , 108 months, post #242
I'm not trying to hate or start a war but can we be honest for a lil bit? The acting in this movie judging by the trailer is maybe softcore porn quality at best. I'm sorry but there is a reason why this movie hasn't been released yet. The quality is just not there so it's gonna take everything from the producers and marketing companies to get this film available to people. Look at Natalie Knepp's resume on IMDB. She hasn't had that much success or mainstream exposure. She's been in b movies or very very indie movies and guest star bits on tv shows. I'm not saying she's trash but you have to set your expectations to the quality that is being given out. I'm curious to see the movie but at the end of the day, we have to be honest about our expectations of the quality of the movie.

From: guest (Jc) , 108 months, post #243
acting is like beauty. It's in the eye of the beholder. It's all about perception. The acting in the trailer to me was fine considering this is a comedy with a bit of magic thrown in
and doesn't require the actors to give a dramatic performances

From: guest , 108 months, post #244
Sorry if I'm repeating myself (I'm sure I mentioned this before but don't want to go through 12 pages) and hence sorry for making it clear what I meant but from what I've seen of the snippets of footage from the trailers, the story of a guy waking up on the morning of an important meeting at work and having to pretend he's his own female cousin at it because his body's been mysteriously changed is the plot of almost all of the 13 Lalola series.

From where the plot of the movie seems to be going after that from what I can tell seems to also be where most of the Lalola series ended up except I think Chile, Portugal, Indonesia and India (sort of).

I'm sure it's most likely a co-incidence (in the same way that the movies Event Horizon and Sunshine had almost identical plots, if the makers of Sunshine had known, I'm sure they would have changed it) but given that that it's hard if not impossible to prove a negative ... even though I think it's unlikely anything will happen but there's always the chance that a copyright issue came up because the plot is so similar to the basic premise of Lalola is what I'm referring to.

Obviously though, I haven't seen the whole film, just going off the trailers and what people have implied about the direction of where the film heads. So, is it really similar all up or does it end up deviating a lot?

From: guest (fair) , 108 months, post #245
@cj Whoa there, where did all that come from? That is not a good defense sir! The old have been bemoaning the wayward youth as long as humanity has been around. Its a logical fallacy grounded in fear and conservatism. It's the attitude of those who defend hatred (in the form of laws, discrimination, and harassment) against transgenderism, LGBT, and other issues they don't understand. In the end, saying that we will destroy ourselves because of the morals of the young today... it boils down to fear of things that are different than the way it was in the time and place where you grew up. We certainly have important growth to do as a civilization and as a species in the face of growing populations approaching the limit of available resources... Implying that your reactice and defensive post on a fetish forum is part of that progress seems a bit silly, no?

And regarding Sam... The story is enough of a trope that there's no way a legal challenge could succeed regarding a stolen storyline. Also, with Sam being such a small production there's no way it would be worth it to attack them.

As far as the acting and quality of production, everyone following the film here closely is likely well aware. It is what it is. Do you go to a local community theater production and complain that they didn't have the budget of a Broadway play? Its all about the subject matter here.

From: guest (Saint) , 108 months, post #246
I saw the movie. The acting is arguably good I don't know what's up with the "soft core porn" comparison. If you ask me that's Megan Fox's range and she's headlining summer tentpole films.

Natalie Knepp is actually pretty damn great.

The reason why this film hasn't been released yet has nothing to do with quality. That said, it's on a similar level with Zerophilia and the market for these kind of films is a little niche. You play the film festival circuit. That's what they do.

From: cj , 108 months, post #247
@ fair - this is my last off-topic post in reply to your concern in post 237... and in reply to post 245

I was not defending myself. I was simply responding to why I was a bit "snippy". There is no fear or conservative (or liberal) point of view driving my post, nor did it have anything to do with mores. You got an honest opinion of human behavior as I've observed it - past versus present (age is not the issue, some of my generation are the worst offenders). IMO people don't behavior with the same respect, nor put forth the same effort that they once did. Sure, in some cases this is a good thing (when there's more understanding and respect), but in others, it is not (when people behave / act with more self-interest and less regard for others). Perhaps re-read my last paragraph in post 241 and note the words Seems , feel , and IMO (which stands for "In My Opinion ") -- there were no hard facts, just observations, opinions and feelings. I am human.

The thing is, was post 234's guest ignorant, lazy, looking for instant gratification, or seeking pirated video... I don't know, but a bit of common sense, patience, and respect would have probably prevented that post from being made.

So, I still stand by my decision to post snippy post 235. We're all human, and prone to errors. And we ALL could stand to have a bit of sense smacked into us (and a bit self-importance whacked out too) from time to time. Even me.

I'll now return the thread back to topic.

From: guest , 108 months, post #248
"And regarding Sam... The story is enough of a trope that there's no way a legal challenge could succeed regarding a stolen storyline. Also, with Sam being such a small production there's no way it would be worth it to attack them."

General tropes may not be copyrightable but specifics can be, that's partly how James Cameron ended up facing a lawsuit from Harlan Ellison over The Terminator (the production company didn't want to risk a lawsuit so they paid up and that relatively speaking wasn't as close as this). From what it looks like, at least the opening part of this film is actually closer to the original Lalola than some of its licenced overseas adaptations. I hate to speak ill of my people but even though various Indian productions are notorious for copying things without attribution (Mr Ya Miss is blatantly an unattributed copy of Blake Edward's Switch as just one example of which there are many) even they must have paid to make a licenced version with Bhaskar Bhati.

Precisely because they're a smaller independent production is also why they'd be at least as likely if not more so face legal action precisely because they don't have a big legal team at their disposal. I'm sure this is all most likely a big co-incidence but that in itself wouldn't be a defence (otherwise everyone would be claiming it in a copyright infringement case).

Anyway, I don't think it would happen but even though I'm sure it's unintentional, just pointing out a theoretically potential problem due to the uncanny similarity to the opening of both if they trailers are anything to go by.


From: guest (vwolverine) , 107 months, post #249
I saw where you can view the entire SAM movie on Youtube but you have to sign up for a free account but give a credit card number. Anyone try this?

From: guest (Amber Smyth) , 107 months, post #250
vwolverine

Wait, what?! Really?! What's the link? And is it a legal link?

From: guest (Scipio) , 107 months, post #251
Blake Edwards admitted in print that SWITCH was inspired by Goodbye Charlie. Did he have to pay the George Axelrod estate? You tell me. The first Lalola was so close to the plot of Switch (much more so than LLL was to G.C.), even to Lola's red jacket, that the resemblance is obvious to any first time viewer. Did Dori Media have to pay Blake Edwards (or the George Axelrod estate)? The idea of a man changing into a woman by the will of a god is probably older than the Mahabharata. Ovid (who told the story of Tiresias) was a latecomer to the plot by those standards. And the idea of waking up in the morning as something new and strange is very old. It was famously used by Kafka a long time ago. Could there be a lawsuit? One can indict a ham sandwich, and probably sue it, too. I met a writer who claimed that "Groundhog Day" ripped his prior story off. Anyone who does any plot is really knowingly or unknowingly stealing from someone in the past. There is nothing original under the sun and I wish that people with greed in their eyes would just chill out.

From: Holly Dunn , 107 months, post #252
That would obviously be a pirated version. And if you want to give your credit card information to someone who is making money by stealing... well that would be up to you.

You may find the price for watching Sam very, very high.



From: guest (Amber Smyth) , 107 months, post #253
Holly Dunn

That's why I was asking if it was legal. I know that you can watch movies on youtube legally (https://www.youtube.com/movies), so I wanted to make sure that was the case here. If it is pirated, I definitely don't want to support that and don't want to give that person any of my personal financial info, no matter how badly I want to see Sam.

From: guest (Saint) , 107 months, post #254
I chatted with the producer and they are currently looking for distribution. If you pay for a bootleg (which I wouldn't recommend) you're screwing over the people that took the money and effort to make the movie

From: guest (Jc) , 107 months, post #255
The thing that draws me to want to see this movie the most is how Natalie Knepp acts as a sexist guy who just got turned into a beautiful woman unwillingly. Only seen the trailer but you get the general feel for how she performs out if it. If I woke up as a woman I can see myself acting and behaving very similar. Slightly shell shocked at first and analyzing every encounter and interaction with people, animals, and just everyday common little things like toilets and how drastically different it is to view reality through the eyes of a female. I can see myself being equally goofy as she is in the trailer :)

From: The Man , 107 months, post #256
Still looking forward to seeing it when it gets a legal release.

From: guest (Dee) , 107 months, post #257
I just checked out the same youtube video and that link is fake as heck! They just wanna steal your money and the length of the movie isn't even correct. I can't say I feel bad for anyone who does give them CC information for them to steal because this is just as bad as clicking on a popup that's telling you that you have a virus and need to protect your pc...

From: guest , 106 months, post #258
So a call out to Saint or anyone else who has seen this movie, since as of yet there's no mention of a VOD or cinema release, would you be willing to do a start to finish plot summary?

From: cj , 106 months, post #259
And for the love of all that is good... if someone does, please alert us to the fact that is a spoiler.

From: guest , 106 months, post #260
Well of course put the plot summary in spoiler text.

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
This thread has been locked.
Reason:Re-directing to latest thread about "Sam (2016)"